Notes on the Lord of the Rings Exhibit at Te Papa, Wellington.

Arwen's Riding Costume:


Lace swatch, well not a net lace, but what you would get if you made machine embroidery lace just on stabilizer fabric then washed away the stabilizer. It is not tacked onto the collar either, but floats, and is sewn into the seams. Or to be more stable, stabilizer and net then cut away the net and stabilizer.

Under skirt is china/butterfly silk dyed a similar shade to the leather but is a bit lighter. It is a very, very fine machined edge. Whether a narrow but long zig zag or some very fine overlock not sure. But industry grade sewing machine at least. Could replicate using a machine though. The width is about what you would get if you finely zig zagged over a fishing line. In fact this might be a way to achieve the same look (ie no flaring of the hem which you get zig zagging) and then remove the fishing line.

Ties are the same silk, but darker. And is very definitely a purple grey, not dove grey, and darker than the suede. There may be some compensation for the lighting, but not much. The front ties are edged like the under skirt, but the back ties are narrowly hemmed. About a 3mm turnover. The back ties are sewn into the seams. No leather tabs were noted and the silk did not appear to be lined either. The ties did not do any purpose for the dummy, so no force was exerted on them.

The undersleeves are a white and metallic silver tissue, quite easy to procure. Only part of the hem looks to be selvage as it is curved (gently not greatly), the part that does look like selvage is right by the seam. But I’m sure the seam also used selvages, so it may be that the hem is not the selvage at all. The ends are unfinished, but this fabric has a tendency to curl which neatens the unfinished hem. The natural crinkly lines of the fabric do go straight down, so this will be an indication of which part will be the selvage, in this fabric I’m sure it follows the lines of the crinkle, so it is not likely to be in the hem. And probably only on one seam allowance per arm.

The suede looks very much like a mix of grades, in texture though not weight. In fact on the inside of the left flared cuff it is a leather like surface, not sueded.

The fronts are cut in one with the back of stand up collar back, the folds on the left hand side look like the collar is darted on the fronts, but this is not apparent on the other side, so is just shadow. There is no centre back seam to the collar, so both fronts are cut in one with the collar.

The princess seams have a baseball stitch as decoration. Probably sewn just over the top layer of suede, the seam allowance probably glued flat in the back and then the hand stitching followed that. This stitching is actually a technique to sew two pieces of a material that do not overlap. The thread looks very worn, and is a barely shade lighter than the suede.

The rolls at the shoulder are quite narrow. They are not an actual sleeve cap, just a decorative effect. The sleeves will be set in.

The fronts are definitely boned, and there is no evidence of an invisible zip. The internal fastening is clearly sewn to the inside, not integrated with the seam of the collar and facings. This seam is uninterrupted past the point where the bodice closes. The boning is also uneven, i.e. one front is slightly more pronounced than the other, in keeping with what you get with hooks and eyes. Also the shadows showed shallow pits also classic with hook and eye fastening. It looks to be the same fastening as Legolas’s leather top too. What ever they are they are almost certainly the same technique.

The boning is very solid, and actually forced the pointed waistline to curve back somewhat. The selvages of the skirt and bodice also contributes to some waistline disturbance.

The design on the sleeve appears stamped, and even in person is very faint. It was mounted on a stand that was knee high so was quite hard to see.

The sleeve cuffs are very interesting up close. The curve that they are set to in the fitted part of the sleeve is not at all even. There is a normal slop from the front, but the curve at the back is very abrupt and then goes straight up a good few inches as the inner sleeve seam before the front of the overlap it reached. A sketch is much easier to explain this. The sketch I've provided is from the inside of the right sleeve. Note how the curve is gentle at the front then at as the back meets the inside seam again it ends abruptly and goes straight up from there. The front of the curve looks like it would be above the elbow line and the back quite a way below. I suspect the point opposite the inner sleeve seam is where the curve is level with the elbow. But as the dummy had no arms, and certainly not Liv Tyler's arms it's hard to be sure. I'm sure photos of her in the costume will be a better indicator.

The bottom edge of the skirts are also very slightly curved. More like the curve you need for a flared skirt than anything else to take into account the curve of the body. The backs are only slightly flared, enough for a few folds at the hem, but not deep either.

The backs of the under skirt were curved and in fact folded back over themselves for about 6 inches at the hem. Whether this was the fabric being caught between the dummy and the suede, or actually sewn is too difficult to tell.

The boots are gorgeous, though definitely took me back to my days as an extra on Xena;) The back laces up with nine loops on each side, the cord is matching but of cotton, and very similar in thickness to the loops. The loops being quite thick rolled suede. The didn’t look hollow, so either made from rolling the suede several times or wrapping the suede over a cord. The boots appeared to go higher than the lacing, which ended about an inch below the back of the knee of the mannequin. The sueded showed creases above that, but the tops could not be seen. The front decoration is sort of piping, but much thicker and flatter. About 1cm wide and a couple of mm thick. Again the suede looks to have been wrapped around something to give it solidity.


Arwen's Requiem Dress:


The long sleeves of the underdress are trumpet shaped and did not look split. There was some puckering of the inner seam, they didn’t look to be a full half circle like the other wide sleeved dresses in TT, but as there was no way to see the back it’s not definite. The fabric of these sleeves is a very fine white and pale silver brocade. The pattern is very intricate and fine so I did not attempt to draw it, not a classic pine cone paisley, but definitely indian in design. The hem was not finished, but again the metal element to the fabric causes the ends to roll thus neatening the ends.

The pile of the velvet over dress appears to have the nap pointing down. The lighting was from below, but pointed down and it was the bottom of the dress that showed the pale grey highlights while the top of the dress was the darker bluer colour.. The dress puddles on the floor and most of it was folded back under by the dressers of the exhibit. But one tiny peek at the hem, it looked like there was a narrow line of stitching about 2mm from the edge, or was left plain. There was a clear fine indentation, then about 1-2mm of velvet beyond that. Very hard to tell exactly what was going on.

The arm opening is not very curved, in fact looked to be a v. There looked to be a few pits that could be stitches tacking the seam to the upper fabric, but it does look lined. The velvet has a bit more body than normally associated with silk velvet, so the stitches may in fact be used to keep the opening in shape, as you cannot iron velvet to set a seam like that.

The upper sleeve is silk crepe georgette, as it has a very, very fine crepey texture, like seen in the Swim Dress from Titanic. The sleeves look like they are raglan set as there is a diagonal fold on the fabric along this type of line. No seams could be seen elsewhere.

I have sketched the pattern of the embroidery of both necklines, and they are made up of fine silver chain stitch (indicates machine embroidery of indian origin) silver lined bugles and holographic sequins. Not silver, but a holographic silver. The same pattern for the neckline, but the pattern is slightly altered for the curve. There are 3 1/2 repeats of the pattern from centre front to shoulder.
The beads on the over dress look like very short bugles with a rocaille inner (square hole silver lined). I have some 10mm long bugles like this and the flash of the silver looks just like that. They could be just normal short silver lined bugles, around 2-3mm long.

The under dress trim is set on a real silver tissue, as opposed to the white and silver tissue of the chase dress. The lower edge of the silver tissue on the sleeves is folded under itself and there is a row of silver braid mounted with bugles and silver chain stitch (like on the upper edge) which looks to be an extention of the design, and is *not* on top of the silver tissue, but just below it.

The ground of the trim on the over dress is actually a slightly purpley blue silk. Not textured enough to be petersham, but also not a perfectly smooth fabric. Quite fine.


Hope dress swatches:

The velvet is a slightly browner maroon than I remembered but very close to the photos on the ACS site.

The sleeves are actually a crepe georgette, not chiffon. The beads are the same as used for the belt of the mirror dress, the leaf veins not outlines of the pattern, so short satin finighed off white.


Arwens sword:

The handle has gold coloured matt decals for the decoration it looked very much like inlay work, but there was some overlap of the decals to show this was not the case, and that it wasn’t painted either. I think it was then varnished over the top. Like with decoupage.